Opposition to the payment order

Opposition to the payment order

The payment order is a judicial procedure initiated in Switzerland by a creditor to recover a debt. It is the first step in the pursuit process and serves as a formal means by which the creditor demands payment of a due sum. This process is governed by the Federal Act on Debt Collection and Bankruptcy (FDCB), which establishes the rules and procedures to be followed.

A summary of the steps in the pursuit process is essential to understand the importance of opposition to the payment order. The pursuit begins with the issuance of a payment order to the debtor, followed by the possibility for the latter to file an opposition. If no opposition is made, the pursuit continues, but if an opposition is raised, different procedures can be initiated, some of which will be examined in more detail in the following sections of this article.

Finally, it should be noted that opposition to the payment order is a key step in the pursuit process in Switzerland. It offers the debtor an opportunity to contest the claim and engage in dialogue with the creditor, potentially leading to an amicable settlement.

This step is particularly important in the context of protecting the rights of the debtor and plays a crucial role in maintaining a balance between the interests of the parties in the Swiss legal system.

Conditions for opposing the payment order

Concerning the necessary conditions for opposing, the law requires that the debtor have valid reasons to contest the debt. These may include the absence of debt, an error in the amount, or any other legitimate reason. Mere disagreement is not enough; the opposition must be based on legally valid reasons.

The deadline for filing an opposition is also a crucial aspect of this procedure. According to the FDCB, the debtor has ten days from receiving the payment order to file an opposition. Failure to meet this deadline can lead to the loss of the right to contest the claim. It is therefore essential that the debtor acts promptly and in accordance with the law.

The immediate effect of opposition is the temporary halt of the pursuit. Once the opposition is registered, the creditor can no longer continue the collection procedure without undertaking additional legal measures. This provides the debtor with significant protection against potentially unfounded pursuits and allows for a more thorough examination of the situation.

Finally, there are special cases and exceptions in the opposition procedure to the payment order. For example, in certain circumstances, the debtor may request an extension of the opposition period. Similarly, certain debts, such as alimony claims, may be exempt from the obligation to oppose. These nuances reflect the complexity of Swiss law in terms of pursuits and require a deep understanding on the part of the involved parties.

Subsequent procedures following opposition

After opposing the payment order, Swiss law provides several steps that can be followed, depending on the circumstances. The conciliation procedure is often the first of these steps. This is a mediation effort where both parties are encouraged to find an amicable solution to their dispute. It is usually conducted before a conciliation authority and can lead to an agreement that ends the pursuit. If no solution is found, the procedure can continue.

In the absence of an agreement during conciliation, the procedure can proceed according to an ordinary or simplified process. The ordinary procedure is longer and more formal, used for more significant or complex claims. The simplified procedure is quicker and less costly, and is generally applied for smaller or less contested claims. The distinction between these two paths is essential for the parties to understand, as it affects not only the duration and cost of the procedure but also the rights and obligations of the parties.

Engaging a lawyer and associated costs is another crucial aspect of the subsequent procedures following opposition. While engaging a lawyer is not mandatory, it is often recommended, especially in more complicated cases. Lawyer’s fees and other legal costs can quickly accumulate, and it is important for the parties to understand these costs and incorporate them into their decision to proceed with the procedure.

The procedure in the event of no agreement between the parties is another key stage. If conciliation fails and no agreement is found in subsequent steps, the case can be brought before a court. This can be a long and costly process, and both parties must be fully aware of the potential risks and rewards. The court’s decision will be final and binding, except in the case of an appeal according to applicable rules.

The possible continuation of the procedure in case of failed conciliation is also an important consideration. If the opposition is maintained and conciliation fails, the creditor has the option to continue the procedure by initiating legal action. This can be a costly and complex step, requiring careful analysis and thorough preparation.

Implications and consequences

The consequences for the creditor of opposing the payment order are varied and depend on the outcome of the procedure. If the opposition is lifted, the creditor may face additional costs and delays in recovering the claim. The need to follow a legal procedure can also require time and resources, and there is no guarantee of success. This can pose particular challenges for creditors, especially those who depend on the rapid recovery of the claim.

For the debtor, opposing the payment order offers important protection against unjustified or excessive claims. However, it can also lead to consequences, including legal fees and the possibility of an unfavorable court decision. Additionally, the procedure can impact the debtor’s reputation, particularly if it is a business, and can affect their relationships with other creditors and business partners.

The impact on third parties is also an important consideration. For example, if the debtor is a business, opposition to the payment order can have repercussions on its employees, suppliers, and other parties with interests in the business. This can lead to payment delays, affect confidence, and even have repercussions on the financial stability of the business.

The potential effects on reputation and credit should not be overlooked either. Prolonged opposition to the payment order can be recorded in credit databases, which can affect the debtor’s ability to obtain loans or other forms of credit in the future. This can have long-term consequences, particularly if the debtor is a business or an individual dependent on access to credit.

Finally, ethical and moral considerations play a role in understanding and managing opposition to the payment order. Creditors must act responsibly and fairly in the collection of claims, while debtors should be aware of their obligations and rights. Balancing these interests can be delicate and requires thoughtful consideration and special attention.

In conclusion, the implications and consequences of opposing the payment order in Switzerland are vast and complex. They affect not only the creditor and debtor but also third parties and society as a whole. A thorough understanding of these aspects can help the parties navigate this difficult process and make informed decisions that protect their interests while respecting the principles of justice and equity.

An initial consultation

from 60 min to CHF 220.00

Asses your situation with a specialized lawyer.

You only want an appointment to ask some questions?
Not sure what to do?
Is your situation unclear?

Opt for an initial consultation with a lawyer.

You will then decide if you wish to proceed and our lawyers will give you the cost of the procedure according to your case. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.

Need a lawyer in Geneva?

Take an appointment now

by calling our secretariat or by filling out the form below. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.

+41 22 348 32 35