Obligation to work in the context of divorce

The obligation to work within the Swiss matrimonial framework is a legal concept reflecting the individual responsibility of each spouse to contribute to their own maintenance after a divorce. This concept is rooted in the notions of autonomy and individual responsibility and forms an essential part of how Swiss law approaches financial matters in the context of divorce.

In Swiss law, marriage is considered a partnership in which both parties have mutual responsibilities, including providing for each other’s needs. After divorce, this mutual responsibility does not completely disappear but evolves to reflect the new reality of the parties as separate individuals. The obligation to work embodies this evolution by requiring each party to make reasonable efforts to provide for their own needs.

The principle of the obligation to work is not designed to be punitive or burdensome. Instead, it is based on a balanced understanding of each party’s capabilities and circumstances. It recognizes that while divorce ends the marriage, it does not automatically release spouses from all responsibilities they had as married partners.

The obligation to work is also linked to other aspects of divorce, such as maintenance contributions. It plays a role in determining the necessity and amount of maintenance contribution that may be required. If a spouse is capable of working but chooses not to do so, this can influence the court’s decision on maintenance contributions.

Criteria for the obligation to work

The obligation to work in the context of Swiss matrimonial law is a nuanced and multifaceted notion. It is not imposed in a strict and rigid manner but is rather assessed based on several criteria that consider the individual situation of each party.

The age of the party is one of the key factors in this assessment. An older person, particularly as they approach retirement age, may face difficulties in finding employment. Job opportunities can be limited, and employability may decrease with age. Thus, the obligation to work may be moderated or even eliminated depending on the spouse’s age.

Health status is another significant criterion. If a person suffers from an illness or disability that prevents them from working, the obligation to seek employment is naturally reduced. Swiss law recognizes that the capacity to work can be hindered by health issues, and this consideration is incorporated into the evaluation of the obligation to work.

Qualifications and professional experience also play a crucial role. A person cannot be forced to take a job that is significantly below their skills and experience. For example, if a spouse has worked for many years in a specialized field, it might be unreasonable to expect them to accept a job not matching their skills. The law considers this factor to ensure that the obligation to work is balanced and fair.

Finally, family obligations can influence the obligation to work. If a spouse has custody of children and they require constant care, this can seriously limit the ability to work. Swiss law recognizes that the responsibility of caring for children can hinder the possibility of finding and accepting employment, and this is taken into account in the evaluation of the obligation to work.

Connection with maintenance contributions

Maintenance contribution in the context of Swiss matrimonial law is a crucial mechanism aimed at ensuring that each party’s needs are met after divorce. It considers the economic realities of both spouses and aims to prevent a marked inequality in their respective standards of living. Maintenance contribution is deeply connected to the obligation to work, and these two aspects are often examined together to ensure a fair and equitable balance.

The determination of maintenance contributions takes into account various factors, including the needs and resources of both parties, their health status, the duration of the marriage, among others. The goal is to reach a solution that considers each spouse’s capacity to provide for their own needs while recognizing the mutual responsibilities that may persist after divorce.

The relationship between maintenance contribution and the obligation to work is particularly significant. The obligation to work imposes on each spouse the duty to make reasonable efforts to contribute to their own maintenance, to the extent of their abilities. Maintenance contribution, on the other hand, comes into play when these efforts are not sufficient to ensure an adequate standard of living.

The link between these two concepts is complex and delicate. If a spouse is capable of working but does not make sufficient effort to do so, this can reduce or even eliminate their right to maintenance contributions. In other words, the court may consider that a spouse who neglects their obligation to work without valid reason should not be rewarded with maintenance contributions from the other spouse.

However, this relationship is not automatic, and the evaluation must be made on a case-by-case basis. For example, if a spouse is not working due to legitimate family responsibilities, such as child custody, or due to health problems, this situation may justify maintenance contributions, even in the absence of work.

The obligation to work and maintenance contributions in Swiss matrimonial law reflect the idea that divorce should not lead to a financially precarious situation for either party. Balancing these two aspects requires a detailed and sensitive evaluation of each party’s capabilities, needs, and resources. As such, they often necessitate the expertise of a specialized lawyer to ensure that rights and responsibilities are correctly assessed and implemented.

An initial consultation

from 60 min to CHF 220.00

Asses your situation with a specialized lawyer.

You only want an appointment to ask some questions?
Not sure what to do?
Is your situation unclear?

Opt for an initial consultation with a lawyer.

You will then decide if you wish to proceed and our lawyers will give you the cost of the procedure according to your case. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.

The next steps

  1. You make an appointment with one of our lawyers
  2. We establish together the next steps
  3. We draw up the documents (agreement and petition) by one of our lawyers
  4. You validate the acts
  5. We send the documents to the court
  6. We accompany you to the court hearing
  7. We check the judgment

Our lawyers

Me Sara Perez

Me Pauline Schott

Need a lawyer in Geneva?

Take an appointment now

by calling our secretariat or by filling out the form below. Appointments available in person or by videoconference.

+41 22 348 32 35